![]() ![]() My main concern is manually-entered captions and geolocation metadata - of which I have quite a lot. I appreciate that editing and filtering settings are unlikely to carry across to Darktable with anything like full fidelity, and I'm ok with that. I'm not keen on this as most of my photos are non-raw and modifying them breaks the whole non-destructive editing premise of Lightroom - even if it is to migrate off it. However it seems that LR only generates sidecars for raw files, and for jpegs etc it writes IPCT metadata directly to the source image file. ![]() My understanding is that the best migration path is to generate XML sidecars using Lightroom, and then inhale these into Darktable. But I still want something with Lightroom-like features for more occasional use, so I'm looking at Darktable. I find that I'm not using Lightroom sufficiently often to justify the cost - and I basically don't use any of the other bundled stuff. I'm on the Adobe photography plan and am looking to get off it. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |